• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
周伟, 李明会, 张兴宇, 贺佳飞. 2005: 同一生境牛蛙与昭觉林蛙蝌蚪的食性比较. 动物学研究, 26(1): 89-95.
引用本文: 周伟, 李明会, 张兴宇, 贺佳飞. 2005: 同一生境牛蛙与昭觉林蛙蝌蚪的食性比较. 动物学研究, 26(1): 89-95.
ZHOU Wei, LI Ming-hui, ZHANG Xing-yu, HE Jia-fei. 2005. Food Comparison Between Tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana and R.chaochiaoensis Collected from the Same Habitat. Zoological Research, 26(1): 89-95.
Citation: ZHOU Wei, LI Ming-hui, ZHANG Xing-yu, HE Jia-fei. 2005. Food Comparison Between Tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana and R.chaochiaoensis Collected from the Same Habitat. Zoological Research, 26(1): 89-95.

同一生境牛蛙与昭觉林蛙蝌蚪的食性比较

Food Comparison Between Tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana and R.chaochiaoensis Collected from the Same Habitat

  • 摘要: 对采自昆明东北郊同一水塘的牛蛙和昭觉林蛙蝌蚪进行食性分析。结果表明,牛蛙蝌蚪Ⅰ、Ⅱ期的食物种类分别为8大类51种和37种,而昭觉林蛙蝌蚪Ⅱ期的食物种类有6大类30种;两者的食物组成均以硅藻门、绿藻门、蓝藻门为主,但昭觉林蛙蝌蚪Ⅱ期与牛蛙蝌蚪Ⅰ期的摄食种类差异极显著,与牛蛙Ⅱ期的不显著。昭觉林蛙蝌蚪Ⅱ期与牛蛙蝌蚪Ⅰ、Ⅱ期的食物生态位重叠度分别为0.6952和0.6887,单位体重摄食的生物量分别是后两者的10.96倍和15.48倍,但百分率相似性指数并不高(分别为54.95% 和58.11%)。与等重量牛蛙蝌蚪相比,昭觉林蛙蝌蚪食物量较大,即昭觉林蛙蝌蚪为生存所需要的生物量远高于牛蛙蝌蚪。本文结果及野外观察表明,昭觉林蛙与牛蛙蝌蚪存在较激烈的食物竞争,且前者处于不利地位。

     

    Abstract: Tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana and R.chaochiaoensis were collected from the same pond in the northeast suburb of Kunming.Their foods were analyzed.The results showed that food items of R.catesbeiana were eight types and 51 categories in tadpole stage Ⅰ,and eight types and 33 categories in tadpole stage Ⅱ.Food items of R.chaochiaoensis were six types and 30 categories in tadpole stage Ⅱ.Bacillariophyta,Chlorophyta,Cyanophyta were main items of food components in two species.However,there was a remarkable difference of food categories between tadpole stage Ⅱ of R.chaochiaoensis and stage Ⅰ of R.catesbeiana,and there was not difference of food categories between tadpole stage Ⅱ of R.chaochiaoensis and R.catesbeiana.Comparisons among tadpole stage Ⅱ of R.chaochiaoensis with stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ of R.catesbeiana,food niche overlap indexes were 0.6952 and 0.6887;biomass of unit body weight (food biomass/average weight) were 10.96 times and 15.48 times of two stages of R.catesbeiana;the indexes of percentage similarity of food (PS) were not high,I.e.54.95% and 58.11%.Comparisons between the same body weight tadpoles of R.chaochiaoensis and R.catesbeiana,the tadpole of R.chaochiaoensis has greater food quantity.The biomass needed for survival by the tadpole of R.chaochiaoensis was higher than the tadpole of R.catesbeiana.The results both in this text and observed in the field indicated that there was a drastic competition between tadpoles of R.catesbeiana and R.chaochiaoensis in food.Tadpoles of R.chaochiaoensis were in a disadvantageous position.

     

/

返回文章
返回