• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
谢仲桂, 谢从新, 张鹗. 2003: 我国华鳊属鱼类形态差异及其物种有效性的研究. 动物学研究, 24(5): 321-330.
引用本文: 谢仲桂, 谢从新, 张鹗. 2003: 我国华鳊属鱼类形态差异及其物种有效性的研究. 动物学研究, 24(5): 321-330.
XIE Zhong-gui, XIE Cong-xin, ZHANG E. 2003. Morphological Variations Among the Chinese Species of Sinibrama (Pisces:Teleostei:Cyprinidae),with Comments on Their Species Validities. Zoological Research, 24(5): 321-330.
Citation: XIE Zhong-gui, XIE Cong-xin, ZHANG E. 2003. Morphological Variations Among the Chinese Species of Sinibrama (Pisces:Teleostei:Cyprinidae),with Comments on Their Species Validities. Zoological Research, 24(5): 321-330.

我国华鳊属鱼类形态差异及其物种有效性的研究

Morphological Variations Among the Chinese Species of Sinibrama (Pisces:Teleostei:Cyprinidae),with Comments on Their Species Validities

  • 摘要: 为探讨华鳊属鱼类种间和种内居群间的形态差异及其物种有效性,采用多变量形态度量,结 合传统分类方法,获得该属鱼类不同地理居群共224尾标本的32个测量性状和7个可数性状数 据,并做主成分分析。在可数性状上,海南华鳊各居群间无差异,但明显不同于其他种类; 四川华鳊与大眼华鳊差别明显,与伍氏华鳊之间也存在较大程度的差异;大眼华鳊的乌江和 珠江居群之间存在显著差异,而伍氏华鳊各地理居群差异不明显。在可量性状上,四川华鳊 和大眼华鳊的乌江居群都明显区别于其他种或居群,而大眼华鳊的珠江居群与伍氏华鳊之间 以及海南华鳊各居群之间没有明显差异。对上述结果分析认为:四川华鳊和海南华鳊为两个 有效的物种;大眼华鳊的乌江标本是一个未被描述的物种,而珠江居群和伍氏华鳊各居群应 属同一个种。

     

    Abstract: Data on 32 morphometric and seven meristic characters of 224 specimens from four currently recognized Sinibrama species in southern China were collected by using multivariate morphometrics and traditional taxonomy methods,and then analyzed with the principal component analysis for investigating morphological variations among them and evaluate their species validities.The meristic characters showed that S.affinis is clearly distinct from other congeners,and S.taeniatus is separated distinctly from S.macrops,but from S.wui to that extent that both have no overlap in the scatterplots of the first two principal components.And the specimen from the Wu Jiang and Pearl River are significantly different from each other,though they are presently reported as the same species,S.macrops,while no intraspecific variations are found among populations of S.wui.According to the morphometric characters,S.taentiatus is clearly separated from other species;S.macrops has two distinct populations,of which the Wu Jiang population is discriminated from those of S.wui and S.affins,but no difference is found between the Pearl River population of S.macrops and those of S.wui and S.affins.Above results indicate that S.taeniatus and S.affinis are two valid species;S.macrops involves two distinct species,of which the Wu Jiang population represents an unnamed species,and the Pearl River population is conspecific with S.wui.

     

/

返回文章
返回