留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)

Li WEI Wei-Wei SHAO Zhi-Hua LIN

Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Zhi-Hua LIN. Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae). Zoological Research, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
Citation: Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Zhi-Hua LIN. Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae). Zoological Research, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014

饰纹姬蛙求偶鸣声特征分析

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (30970435, 31270443); 丽水市科技计划项目 (20110426)
详细信息
  • 中图分类号: Q915.863

Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)

  • 摘要: 2012年5月, 用SX950录音笔和Praat声音分析软件对浙江丽水繁殖季节饰纹姬蛙(Microhyla ornata)求偶鸣声进行录制和特征分析。结果表明, 饰纹姬蛙发出的求偶鸣声具有单一谐波鸣声结构、多脉冲(7、9~16)及纺锤形振幅等特征; 所有鸣声主频率范围为1.22~4.09 kHz (n=233), 且由不同脉冲数组成的鸣声主频率平均值几近相等; 叫声时程随脉冲数的增加而增大, 脉冲时程在不同脉冲数鸣声中的大小几近相等, 但最后一个脉冲的时程大小≤其他脉冲; 脉冲间隔与叫声时程则刚好相反, 即叫声时程越短, 脉冲间隔就越大。在7个脉冲的鸣声中, 其脉冲间隔最大, 脉冲率最小;而在16个脉冲的鸣声中, 脉冲间隔则最小, 脉冲率最大。除7个脉冲和16个脉冲鸣声的脉冲率分别与其他鸣声存在显著性差异以外, 随着叫声时程和脉冲数的增加, 脉冲率也出现相应变化。在声强方面, 除16个脉冲鸣声与其余所有的脉冲鸣声出现显著性差异以外, 其他脉冲鸣声之间的两两比较差异不显著。丽水种群与其他5个地理种群(杭州、宣城、Karnoor、Bajipe和Padil)的鸣声特征比较显示饰纹姬蛙在不同地理种群的鸣声结构相似, 而鸣声主频率、叫声时程、脉冲时程及脉冲率等在6个地理种群种均出现不同程度的差异。了解不同物种的声信号特征有助于更好地理解动物通讯行为及其进化特点。
  • [1] Abrunhosa PA, Pimenta BVS, Cruz CAG, Haddad CFB. 2005. Advertisement calls of species of the Hyla albosignata group (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arq Mus Nac: Rio de Janeiro, 63(2): 275-282.
    [2] Bee MA, Perrill SA, Owen PC. 1999. Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45(3-4): 177-184.
    [3] Borgia G. 1985. Bower quality, number of decorations and mating success of male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus): an experimental analysis. Animal Behavior, 33(1): 266-271.
    [4] Chen Q, Cui JG, Fang GZ, Brauth SE, Tang YZ. 2011. Acoustic analysis of the advertisement calls of the music frog, Babina daunchina. Journal of Herpetology, 45(4): 406-416.
    [5] Cui JG, Tang YZ, Narins PM. 2012. Real estate ads in Emei music frog vocalizations: female preference for calls emanating from burrows. Biological Letter, 8(3): 337-340.
    [6] Cui JG, Song XY, Fang GZ, Xu F, Brauth SE, Tang YZ. 2011. Circadian rhythm of calling behavior in the Emei music frog (Babina daunchina) is associated with habitat temperature and relative humidity. Asian Herpetology Research, 2(3): 149-154.
    [7] Doty GV, Welch AM. 2001. Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49(2-3): 150-156.
    [8] Fei L, Hu SQ, Ye CY, Huang YZ. 2009. Fauna Sinica Amphibia, Vol. 2, Anura. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).
    [9] Gerhardt HC. 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 25(1): 293-324.
    [10] Giacoma C, Zugolaro C, Beani L. 1997. The advertisement calls of the green toad (Bufo viridis): variability and role in mate choice. Herpetologica, 53(4): 454-464.
    [11] Hernández M, Alonso R, Ariel-Rodríguez A. 2010. Advertisement call of Peltophryne florentinoi (Anura: Bufonidae), an endemic toad from Zapata Swamp, Cuba. Amphibia-Reptilia, 31(2): 265-272.
    [12] Heyer WR, Barrio-Amorós CL. 2009. The advertisement calls of two sympatric frogs, Leptodactylus lithonaetes (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) and Pristimantis vilarsi (Amphibia: Anura: Strabomantidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 122(3): 282-291.
    [13] Houtman AM. 1992. Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proc R Soc Lond B, 249(1324): 3-6.
    [14] Howard RD, Young J R. 1998. Individual variation in male vocal traits and female mating preferences in Bufo americanus. Anim Behav, 55(5): 1165-1179.
    [15] Huang ZJ, Shang EC, Wang YY. 1982. Analysis of frequency spectrum in frogs. Biol Sci Dyn, 2: 9-11(in Chinese)
    [16] Jiang JP, Xie F, Fei L, Ye CY, Zheng MQ. 2002. Mating calls of six forms of pelobatid in Wawu mountain national forest park, Sichuan, China (Anura: Pelobatidae). Zool Res, 23(1): 89-94.
    [17] Jiang SR, Ding P, Zhuge Y. 1995. The comparative study on the characteristics of calling songs of three frog species. Zool Res, 16(1): 75-81 (in Chinese).
    [18] Krishna SN, Bosch J. 2007. The breeding behaviour and advertisement calls of the tree-hole breeding frog Ramanella Montana (Microhylidae) in the Western Ghats, S. India. Acta Zool Sin, 53(3): 575-578.
    [19] Kuramoto M, Joshy SH. 2006. Morphological and acoustic comparisons of Microhyla ornata, M. fissipes, and M. okinavensis (Anura: Microhylidae). Curr Herpet, 25(1): 15-27.
    [20] Lea J, Dyson M, Halliday T. 2002. Phonotaxis to advertisement calls by midwife toads (Alytes muletensis) is not necessarily related to mating. Amphibia-Reptilia, 23(2): 151-159.
    [21] Lingnau R, Bastos RP. 2007. Vocalizations of the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura: Hylodidae): repertoire and influence of air temperature on advertisement call variation. J Nat His, 41(17-20): 1227-1235.
    [22] McClelland BE, Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ. 1996. Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans). J Exp Biol, 99(9): 1907-1919.
    [23] Moore AJ. 1994. Genetic evidence for the “good genes” process of sexual selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 35(4): 235-241.
    [24] Navas CA, Bevier CR. 2001. Thermal dependency of calling performance in the eurythermic frog Colostethus subpunctatus. Herpetologica, 57(3): 384-395.
    [25] Nicoletto PF.1993. Female sexual response to condition-dependent ornaments in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav, 46(3): 441-450.
    [26] Norris K. 1993. Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major. Nature, 362(6420): 537-539.
    [27] Nunes I, Sampaio RS, Juncá FA. 2007. Advertisement calls of four Hylid frogs from the state of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). South Am J Herpet, 2(2): 89-96.
    [28] Parri S, Alatalo RV, Kotiaho J, Mappes J. 1997. Female choice for male drumming in the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata. Anim Behav, 53(2): 305-312.
    [29] Pröhl H. 2003. Variation in male calling behaviour and relation to male mating success in the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology, 109(4): 273-290.
    [30] Reynolds JD, Gross MR. 1992. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B, 250(1327): 57-62.
    [31] Ritchie MG, Couzin ID, Snedden WA. 1995. What’s in a song? Female bushcrickets discriminate against the song of older males. Proc R Soc Lond B, 262(1363): 21-27.
    [32] Robertson JGM. 1986. Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim Behav, 34(3): 773-784.
    [33] Ryan MJ. 2001. Anuran Communication. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
    [34] Ryan MJ, Rand AS. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution, 47(2): 647-657.
    [35] Shen JX, Feng AS, Xu ZM, Yu ZL, Arch VS, Yu XJ, Narins PM. 2008. Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature, 453(7197): 914-916.
    [36] Tárano Z. 2001. Variation in male advertisement calls in the neotropcial frog Physalaemus enesefae. Copeia, 4: 1064-1072.
    [37] von Schantz T, Göransson G, Andersson G, Fröberg I, Grahn M, Helgée A, Wittzell H. 1989. Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature, 337(6230): 166-169.
    [38] Wagner WE Jr. 1989. Graded aggressive signals in Blanchard's cricket frog: vocal responses to opponent proximity and size. Anim Behav, 38(6): 1025-1038.
    [39] Wei L, Lin ZH, Ma XM, Zhao LH, Ma XH. 2011. Acoustic characteristics of the tiger frog, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, during the breeding season. Zool Res, 32(4): 456-460.
    [40] Wei L, Zhao LH, Ma XH, Fan XL, Ma XM, Lin ZH. 2012. Advertisement call variability in the black-spined toad Bufo melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) during the breeding season in Lishui, Zhejiang, China. Asian Herpet Res, 3(2): 157-162.
    [41] Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC. 1998. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science, 280(5371): 1928-1930.
    [42] Wells KD. 1977. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav, 25(3): 666-693.
    [43] Xu JX, Xie F, Jiang JP, Mo YM, Zheng ZH. 2005. The acoustic features of the mating call of 12 anuran species. Chn J Zool, 40(3): 12-19 (in Chinese).
    [44] Yu BG, Zheng RQ. 2009. The advertisement call of the giant spiny frog Paa spinosa. Curr Zool, 55(6): 411-415.
    [45] Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theo Biol, 53(1): 205-214.
  • [1] Nikolay A. Poyarkov Jr., Vladislav A. Gorin, Than Zaw, Valentina D. Kretova, Svetlana S. Gogoleva, Parinya Pawangkhanant, Jing Che.  On the road to Mandalay: contribution to the Microhyla Tschudi, 1838 (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae) fauna of Myanmar with description of two new species, Zoological Research. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.044
    [2] Zoological Research call for special issue papers, Zoological Research.
    [3] Call for papers of the special issue on Animal Models and Infectious Diseases, Zoological Research.
    [4] Guo-Hua DING, Zhi-Hua LIN, Li-Hua ZHAO, Xiao-Li FAN, Li WEI.  Effects of light intensity on activity in four sympatric anuran tadpoles, Zoological Research. doi: 10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2014.4.332
    [5] Fang ZHANG, Pan CHEN, Shu-Yi ZHAO.  Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments, Zoological Research. doi: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.3.0196
    [6] Li WEI, Zhi-Hua LIN, Ren-You ZHAO, Shi-Tong CHEN.  Prey selection by tiger frog larvae (Hoplobatrachus chinensis) of two sympatric anuran species’ tadpoles, Zoological Research. doi: 10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2013.3.0209
    [7] Minghao GONG, Yanling SONG, Zhisong YANG, Chen LIN.  Important population viability analysis parameters for giant pandas (Aliuropoda melanoleuca), Zoological Research.
    [8] LI Cheng, DONG Zhao-xiong, WANG Yue-zhao.  Microstructure comparison of jaw sheaths between the Megophryid tadpoles (Amphibia, Anura) by the technology of electron microscope, Zoological Research. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.05550
    [9] ZHU Guang-jian, Han Nai-jian, HONG Ti-yu, TAN Min, YU Dong-mei, ZHANG Li-bi.  Echolocation Call, Roost and ND 1 Sequence Analysis of New Record of Nyctalus plancyi(Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)on Hainan Island, Zoological Research. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.04447
    [10] JIANG Jian-ping, YE Chang-yuan, FEI Liang.  A New Horn Toad Megophrys sangzhiensis from Hunan, China (Amphibia,Anura), Zoological Research. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.02219
    [11] YE Chang-yuan, FEI Liang, XIE Feng, JIANG Jian-ping.  A New Ranidae Species from China -Limnonectes bannaensis(Ranidae: Anura), Zoological Research.
    [12] ZHENG Zhong-hua *, XIE Feng, JIANG Jian-ping, FEI Liang.  Ultrastructure and Morphology of the Spermatozoa in Vibrissaphora boringii and Its Taxonomical Sense (Anura: Megophryidae), Zoological Research.
    [13] Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia.  Distribution and Ecology of the Western Ecuador Frog Leptodactylus labrosus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae), Zoological Research.
    [14] LIN Wei ZHENG, Cui-Fang ZHANG, Yan-Ding SHI, Jin CAI, Jing-Lei, GAO Jian-Min.  Using RAPD Method on Systematic Evolution of Four Species in Anura, Zoological Research.
    [15] FEI Liang, YE Chang-yuan.  Taxonomic Studies on Bufo viridis From West China (Amphibia:Anura), Zoological Research.
    [16] RAO Ding-qi, YANG Da-tong.  The Description of A New Ranid Species From Xishuangbanna---Rana bannanica sp.nov., Zoological Research.
    [17] LI Shu-shen, HU Jiang-sheng, FEI Liang.  The Cytogenetic Study on Five Pelotoid Species of Anura in China, Zoological Research.
    [18] JIANG Shi-ren, DING Ping, LI Jian-hua, ZHU ge-Yang.  The Sound Spectrographic Analyses on The Call of Golden Pheasant Chrysolophus pictus, Zoological Research.
    [19] FEI Liang YE Chang-yuan, HUANG Yong-zhao.  Two New Species of The Genus Megophrys,Pelobatidae (Amphibia:Anura) From China, Zoological Research.
    [20] ZHANG Zhi-bin, ZHU Jing, YANG He-fang, HAO Shou-shen, WANG Shu-qing.  Estimating the Reproductive Parameters of Cricetulus triton Population in Hebei,China, Zoological Research.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1481
  • HTML全文浏览量:  23
  • PDF下载量:  1920
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-08-21
  • 修回日期:  2012-11-05
  • 刊出日期:  2013-02-08

Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae)

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
    基金项目:  国家自然科学基金资助项目 (30970435, 31270443); 丽水市科技计划项目 (20110426)
  • 中图分类号: Q915.863

摘要: 2012年5月, 用SX950录音笔和Praat声音分析软件对浙江丽水繁殖季节饰纹姬蛙(Microhyla ornata)求偶鸣声进行录制和特征分析。结果表明, 饰纹姬蛙发出的求偶鸣声具有单一谐波鸣声结构、多脉冲(7、9~16)及纺锤形振幅等特征; 所有鸣声主频率范围为1.22~4.09 kHz (n=233), 且由不同脉冲数组成的鸣声主频率平均值几近相等; 叫声时程随脉冲数的增加而增大, 脉冲时程在不同脉冲数鸣声中的大小几近相等, 但最后一个脉冲的时程大小≤其他脉冲; 脉冲间隔与叫声时程则刚好相反, 即叫声时程越短, 脉冲间隔就越大。在7个脉冲的鸣声中, 其脉冲间隔最大, 脉冲率最小;而在16个脉冲的鸣声中, 脉冲间隔则最小, 脉冲率最大。除7个脉冲和16个脉冲鸣声的脉冲率分别与其他鸣声存在显著性差异以外, 随着叫声时程和脉冲数的增加, 脉冲率也出现相应变化。在声强方面, 除16个脉冲鸣声与其余所有的脉冲鸣声出现显著性差异以外, 其他脉冲鸣声之间的两两比较差异不显著。丽水种群与其他5个地理种群(杭州、宣城、Karnoor、Bajipe和Padil)的鸣声特征比较显示饰纹姬蛙在不同地理种群的鸣声结构相似, 而鸣声主频率、叫声时程、脉冲时程及脉冲率等在6个地理种群种均出现不同程度的差异。了解不同物种的声信号特征有助于更好地理解动物通讯行为及其进化特点。

English Abstract

韦力, 邵伟伟, 林植华. 饰纹姬蛙求偶鸣声特征分析[J]. 动物学研究, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
引用本文: 韦力, 邵伟伟, 林植华. 饰纹姬蛙求偶鸣声特征分析[J]. 动物学研究, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Zhi-Hua LIN. Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae). Zoological Research, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
Citation: Li WEI, Wei-Wei SHAO, Zhi-Hua LIN. Characteristics of courtship calls of Microhyla ornata (Anura: Microhylidae). Zoological Research, 2013, 34(1): 14-20. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2013.01014
参考文献 (45)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回