• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸. 2005: 氮沉降对三种林型土壤动物群落生物量的影响. 动物学研究, 26(6): 609-615.
引用本文: 徐国良, 莫江明, 周国逸. 2005: 氮沉降对三种林型土壤动物群落生物量的影响. 动物学研究, 26(6): 609-615.
XU Guo-liang, MO Jiang-ming, ZHOU Guo-yi. 2005. Responses of Soil Fauna Biomass to N Deposition in Three Forests in Subtropical China. Zoological Research, 26(6): 609-615.
Citation: XU Guo-liang, MO Jiang-ming, ZHOU Guo-yi. 2005. Responses of Soil Fauna Biomass to N Deposition in Three Forests in Subtropical China. Zoological Research, 26(6): 609-615.

氮沉降对三种林型土壤动物群落生物量的影响

Responses of Soil Fauna Biomass to N Deposition in Three Forests in Subtropical China

  • 摘要: 从2003年5月~2004年8月, 在华南鼎湖山地区针叶林、混交林和季风林内,采用模拟的方法,构建了对照、低氮[50 kg/(hm2·a)]和中氮处理[100 kg/(hm2·a)]组。在以后近16个月内,利用线框法收集地表凋落物层,在实验室内用Tullgren干漏斗法采集土壤动物标本,最后根据本地区长期土壤动物研究得出的不同类群动物生物量标准,对土壤动物类群生物量在氮沉降下的响应进行研究。结果表明,整体上氮处理对土壤动物类群生物量并未产生显著影响。然而通过氮处理与取样期和林分的交互作用,土壤动物类群生物量对氮沉降有一定的响应趋势。外界的氮输入明显促进了针叶林土壤动物类群生物量的增长,正效应明显;而季风林在较高氮处理下的负效应明显。经历一周年后,土壤动物类群生物量在各林分中的分布格局发生了显著变化,由实验处理前的季风林>混交林>针叶林,变为针叶林>季风林>混交林。低氮处理在一定程度上显示了对土壤动物类群生物量发展的利好作用,各林分动物类群生物量都有不同幅度的上升,平均季风林为44.33%,混交林9.19%,针叶林60.66%;而中氮处理使季风林和混交林分别下降32.55%和2.81%。提示氮沉降对土壤动物类群生物量的影响可能也存在阈值作用。

     

    Abstract: Impacts of simulated atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition on soil fauna biomass were studied in a 16 month period from May 2003 to August 2004. Plots were built in pine forest (PF), pine and broad-leaf mixed forest (MF) and monsoon evergreen broad-leaf forest (MEBF) in Dinghushan of subtropical China. Dissolved NH4NO3 equivalent to the control (No addition), low [50 kg/(hm2·a)], and medium [100 kg/(hm2·a)] was sprayed during the testing period. The biomass of soil fauna group was decided by an experimental standard based on research performed a long time in this area. When the data was averaged throughout the period and across the forests, there were no significant effects of N treatment on soil fauna biomass. However, effects could be observed in the interactions between N and forest type, and the interactions between N and sampling date. There were obviously positive effects of N treatment on soil fauna biomass in PF, but negative effects under abundant N deposition in MEBF. After one year the distribution of soil fauna biomass in different forests was changed significantly, with MEBF>MF>PF before the treatments and PF>MEBF>MF after the treatments. Low N treatment was positive to soil fauna biomass to a certain extent, which increased soil fauna biomass by 44.33% in MEBF, 9.19% in MF and 60.66% in PF; but soil fauna biomass declined generally under the medium treatment, 32.55% in MEBF and 2.81% in MF. The results indicated that there might be a threshold in the effects of N deposition on soil fauna biomass.

     

/

返回文章
返回