• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)
蒋 洁, 武正军, 于 海, 黄乘明, 王振兴. 2009: 鳄蜥的食物识别机制. 动物学研究, 30(5): 553-558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.05554
引用本文: 蒋 洁, 武正军, 于 海, 黄乘明, 王振兴. 2009: 鳄蜥的食物识别机制. 动物学研究, 30(5): 553-558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.05554
JIANG Jie, WU Zheng-jun, YU Hai, HUANG Cheng-ming, WANG Zhen-xing. 2009. Prey Discrimination Mechanisms of Chinese Crocodile
Lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus). Zoological Research, 30(5): 553-558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.05554
Citation: JIANG Jie, WU Zheng-jun, YU Hai, HUANG Cheng-ming, WANG Zhen-xing. 2009. Prey Discrimination Mechanisms of Chinese Crocodile
Lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus). Zoological Research, 30(5): 553-558. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2009.05554

鳄蜥的食物识别机制

Prey Discrimination Mechanisms of Chinese Crocodile
Lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus)

  • 摘要: 鳄蜥(Shinisaurus crocodilurus)食物识别机制的研究,对进一步了解鳄蜥的捕食行为和生态学习性有重要意义。使用棉棒分别沾上去离子水、香水、黄粉虫(Tenebriomolitor L.)和蚯蚓(Pheretima sp.)的气味(蚯蚓和黄粉虫处死后绞碎以便于棉花棒蘸上),观察11只鳄蜥对4种化学刺激的反应,每个个体对每种刺激均进行24次实验重复。实验结果显示:鳄蜥对4种刺激均有反应,对黄粉虫和蚯蚓刺激的舔舌次数显著高于香水和去离子水的舔舌次数(Wilcoxon test,所有P<0.001),表明鳄蜥能检测以及识别控制刺激和食物刺激。再又对鳄蜥进行4种处理实验:(A)空白对照;(B)蚯蚓气味;(C)密封着的活蚯蚓;(D)活蚯蚓。每个个体每种处理均进行5次实验。结果显示:鳄蜥在不同处理下的行为持续时间、探究频次和攻击频次有显著差异(Friedman test,所有P<0.001)。鳄蜥在仅有视觉刺激出现的处理C以及既有化学刺激又有视觉刺激的处理D比仅有化学刺激的处理B在持续时间、探究频次和攻击频次上显著要高(所有P<0.001)。在无视觉刺激的条件下,鳄蜥在处理B的行为持续时间以及探究频次均显著高于处理A 的(所有P<0.001);而在视觉信息相同的条件下,鳄蜥在处理D中仅行为持续时间显著高于处理C(Z=3.95, P<0.001),而探究频次以及攻击频次无显著差异(前者Z=1.53, P=0.13;后者Z=1.10, P=0.27)。结果表明鳄蜥主要利用视觉捕食,化学感觉有辅助作用。鳄蜥这种食物识别机制可能与捕食模式和种系发生有关,也可能受食物的影响。

     

    Abstract: In order to understand the foraging behavior and ecology of Chinese crocodile lizard (Shinisaurus crocodilurus), we studied its prey discrimination mechanisms through two series experiments. In the first experiment, the swabs were dampened by deionised water, cologne, smashed earthworm (Pheretima sp.) and smashed tenebrio (Tenebriomolitor L.) as the chemical cues and observed the response of 11 Chinese crocodile lizard. Each individual was tested 24 times to each stimulus.The results showed that all individuals of Chinese crocodile lizard responded to the swabs by tongue flicking and the number of tongue-flicks in response to tenebrio and earthworm stimuli were significantly higher than that to cologne and deionized water (Wilcoxon test, all P<0.001). It indicate that the Chinese crocodile lizard can discriminate food and non-food stimulus. In the second experiment, we observed the responses of Chinese crocodile lizard to the following cues: (A) blank utensil, (B) the utensil was wetted by smashed earthworm, (C) the alive earthworm was sealed in the utensil, (D) alive earthworm was kept in the open utensil. Each individual was tested 5 times in each cue. Results showed that the Chinese crocodile lizard for each cue was significantly different in dealing time, investigation frequency and attack frequency(all P<0.001). The dealing time, investigation frequency and attack frequency in cue C(only visual cue)and in cue D (visual and chemical cue)were significantly high than in cue B(only chemical cue)(all P<0.001). Without visual cue, the dealing time and investigation frequency were significantly high than in cue A (blank)(all P<0.001). Under the same visual cues, only dealing time in cue D was higher than that in cue D (Z=3.95, P<0.001), but investigation frequency and attack frequency were not different between cue C and D (for former Z=1.53, P=0.13;for latter Z=1.10, P=0.27) . These indicate that Chinese crocodile lizard rely more on visual cues to discriminate prey than on chemical cues. The prey discrimination mechanisms of Chinese crocodile lizard may be related with foraging mode, phylogeny and prey.

     

/

返回文章
返回