留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Brood parasitism and egg mimicry on Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler (Cettia fortipes) by Lesser Cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus)

YANG Can-Chao CAI Yan LIANG Wei

YANG Can-Chao, CAI Yan, LIANG Wei. Brood parasitism and egg mimicry on Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler (Cettia fortipes) by Lesser Cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus). Zoological Research, 2010, 31(5): 555-560. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.05555
Citation: YANG Can-Chao, CAI Yan, LIANG Wei. Brood parasitism and egg mimicry on Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler (Cettia fortipes) by Lesser Cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus). Zoological Research, 2010, 31(5): 555-560. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.05555

小杜鹃对强脚树莺的巢寄生及其卵色模拟

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2010.05555
基金项目: 2009年度教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0111)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    杨灿朝(1981-),男,博士后,主要从事鸟类生态学研究

    通讯作者:

    梁 伟

  • 中图分类号: Q959.732;Q959.739;S865.3503

Brood parasitism and egg mimicry on Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler (Cettia fortipes) by Lesser Cuckoo (Cuculus poliocephalus)

More Information
    Author Bio:

    YANG Can-Chao (1981-).

    Corresponding author: LIANG Wei
  • 摘要: 于1999—2009年的鸟类繁殖季(4—8月)对贵州宽阔水自然保护区内的强脚树莺(Cettia fortipes)的繁殖进行监测,并采用光纤光谱仪,通过主成分分析、反射光谱、罗宾逊投射等方法对强脚树莺的卵色与小杜鹃(Cuculus poliocephalus)对其寄生的卵色模拟程度进行分析。研究结果表明,强脚树莺的繁殖成效在不同年份间均无显著差异,但其巢被捕食率和巢被寄生率都较高,分别为49.26%和9.18%。通过反射光谱分析,表明小杜鹃卵在色调和色度上高度模拟强脚树莺的卵,但其亮度高于宿主卵,而且在人眼无法探测的紫外光部分存在差异。
  • [1] Avilés JM, Soler JJ, Pérez-Contreras T. 2006. Dark nests and egg colour in birds: a possible functional role of ultraviolet reflectance in egg detectability [J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 273: 2821-2829.Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Norris KJ. 1994. Sexual selection and the mismeasure of color [J]. Am Nat, 144: 848-860.Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Lunau K. 1997. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94: 8618-8621.Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM. 1997. Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds [J]. Vision Res, 37: 2183-2194Chen DM, Collins JS, Goldsmith TH. 1984. The ultraviolet receptors in bird retinas [J]. Science, 225: 337-339.Cherry MI, Bennett ATD. 2001. Egg colour matching in an African cuckoo, as revealed by ultraviolet-visible reflectance spectrophotometry [J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 268: 565-571.Collier R., Zigman S. 1987. The grey squirrel lens protects the retina from near-UV radiation damage [J] Prog Clin Biol Res, 247: 571-585.Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier EJ. 1999. Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian dichromatism [J]. Am Nat, 153: 183-200.Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD, Church SC, Hart NS, Hunt S. 2000. Ultraviolet vision in birds [J]. Adv Stud Behav, 29: 159-214.Davies NB, Brooke M de L. 1988. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptation and counteradaptation [J]. Anim Behav, 36: 262-284.Davies NB. 2000. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats [M]. London: Poyser.Endler JA, Théry M. 1996. Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds [J]. Am Nat, 148: 421-452.Endler JA. 1978. A predator's view of animal color patterns [J]. Evol Biol, 11: 319-364.Endler JA. 1990. On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns [J]. Biol J Linn Soc, 41: 315-352.Endler JA, Paul WM. 2005. Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them [J]. Biol J Linn Soc, 86: 405-431.Grill CP, Rush VN. 2000. Analysis spectral data: comparision and application of two techniques [J]. Biol J Linn Soc, 69: 121-138.Hays H, Lecroy M. 1971. Field criteria for determining incubation stage in eggs of the common tern [J]. Wilson Bull, 83: 425-429.Higuchi H. 1998. Host use and egg color of Japanese Cuckoos [M]//Rothstein SI, Robinson SK. Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts: Studies in Coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 80-93.Hockey PAR. 1982. Adaptiveness of nest site selection and egg coloration in the African Black Oystercatcher Haematopus moquini [J]. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 11: 117-123.Honza M, Pola?iková L, Procházka P. 2007. Ultraviolet and green parts of the colour spectrum affect egg rejection in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) [J]. Biol J Linn Soc, 92: 269-276.Hoyt DF. 1979. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs [J]. Auk, 96: 73-77.Hunt S, Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Griffiths R. 1998. Blue tits are ultraviolet tits [J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 265: 451-455.Jiang YX, Liang W, Yang CC, Sun YH. 2006. Brood parasitism on bush warbler by lesser cuckoo [J]. Chn J Zool, 41(5): 31.
    [2] [蒋迎昕, 梁 伟, 杨灿朝, 孙悦华. 2006. 小杜鹃在强脚树莺巢中寄生繁殖. 动物学杂志, 41(5): 31.]Langmore NE, Bennett ATD. 1999. Strategic concealment of sexual identity in an estrildid finch [J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 266: 513-550.Lloyd P, Plaganyi E, Lepage D, Little RM, Crowe TM. 2000. Nest-site selection, egg pigmentation and clutch predation in the gound-nesting Namaque Sandgrouse Pterocles namaque [J]. Ibis, 142: 123-131.Lowther PE. 1988. Spotting pattern of the last laid egg of the house sparrow [J]. J Field Ornithol, 59: 51-54.Lythgoe JN. 1979. The Ecology of Vision [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Martin TE, Scott J, Menge C. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects [J]. Proc R Soc Lond B, 267: 2287-2293.Mason P, Rothstein SI. 1987. Crypsis versus mimicry and the evolution of shiny cowbird eggs [J]. Am Nat, 130: 161-167.Nice MM. 1937. Studies in the life history of the song sparrow [J]. Tran Linn Soc New York, 4: 1-246.Pribil S. 1998. Reproductive success is a misleading indicator of nest-site preference in the Red-winged Blackbird [J]. Can J Zool, 76: 2227-2234.Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker TCM. 2006. UV wavelengths affect female mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks [J]. Anim Behav, 71: 307-313.Ruxton GD, Broom M, Colegrave N. 2001. Are unusualy colored eggs a signal to potential conspecific brood parasites? [J] Am Nat, 157: 451-458.Verbeek NAM. 1990. Differential predation on eggs in clutches of northwestern crows: the importance of egg color [J]. Condor, 92: 695-701.Yang CC, Cai Y, Zhang SP, Liang W. 2009. Quantitative analysis of bird egg color by using fiber spectrophotometer [J]. Chn J Ecol, 28(2): 346-349.
    [3] [杨灿朝, 蔡 燕, 张淑萍, 梁 伟. 2009. 利用光纤光谱仪量化和分析鸟类的卵色. 生态学杂志, 28(2): 346-349.]Yang CC, Liang W, Cai Y, Shi SH, Takasu F, M?ller AP, Antonov A, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. 2010. Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host [J]. PLoS ONE, 5(5): e10816.Yu LF, Xie SX, Wu TL. 2004. Scientific Survey of Kuankuoshui Nature Reserve [M]. Guiyang: Guizhou Science and Technology Press. [喻理飞, 谢双喜, 吴太伦. 2004. 宽阔水自然保护区综合科学考察集[M]. 贵阳: 贵州科技出版社.]
    [4]
      
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2092
  • HTML全文浏览量:  142
  • PDF下载量:  1846
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-03-29
  • 修回日期:  2010-07-28
  • 刊出日期:  2010-10-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回